🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are compensated to address white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to remove the history of people of color and experience from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.